[lugm.org] Linus Torvalds finds GNOME 3.4 to be a "total user experience design failure"

[Arvind Doobary]

I've been sharing his feelings since GNOME 3.X. I really find 3.x to be 
very counter-productive and stuck to using Gnome 2. I'll wait a bit more 
to try out Cinnamon though, as I don't have much time to tinker with my 
system for now. Anyone tried Cinnamon (cinnamon.linuxmint.com) ?

-Arv

On 05/06/12 20:56, Yasir MX wrote:
> Torvalds has long disliked the GNOME 3.x family 
> <http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-would-like-to-see-a-gnome-fork/9347>. 
> But, as Torvalds explained in his Google+ posting on GNOME 3.4: 
> <https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4i>
>
>     I broke down, and upgraded my old aging Fedora
>     <http://fedoraproject.org> install on my desktop. Simply because
>     my old F14 comes with ancient X versions that don't contain all
>     the fixes to make Intel 3D really work well. And yes, things
>     really do work better on the graphical side.
>     But with F17 comes gnome3 <http://www.gnome.org/>. And I knew I'd
>     have trouble, but also knew that most of the worst crap could be
>     fixed with extensions, and I'd used 3.4 on my laptop enough to
>     know it should be all somewhat usable.
>
>
>     Torvalds had had enough with the GNOME Shell Extensions way of
>     "fixing" GNOME.
>
>         I have to say, I used to think that the "extensions.gnome.org"
>         approach to fixing the deficiencies in gnome3 was really cool.
>         It made me go "Ahh, now I can fix the problems I had".
>         But it turns out to be a *major* pain, when it basically ends
>         up as a really magical way to customize your desktop, which
>         breaks randomly and has no sane way to do across machines. And
>         the extensions seem to randomly break when you update the
>         system, so they don't work as well as they would if they just
>         came with the base system.
>         End result: extensions.gnome.org may be a really cool idea,
>         but it seems to have some serious usability problems in
>         practice. And the whole gnome3 approach of "by default we
>         don't give you even the most basic tools to fix things, but
>         you can hack around things with unofficial extensions" seems
>         to be a total UX (user experience design) failure.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     Later on in the resulting discussion, several people suggest that
>     Torvalds just use the GNOME 3.4 keyboard shortcuts. Torvalds was
>     not amused.
>
>         I'm really tired of the f*cking old "just use the keyboard
>         shortcuts" crap. Sure, if you're a keyboarding person, then
>         gnome3 is a big improvement. But dammit, if you're like me,
>         and you *write* using the keyboard, and then use mousing for
>         other operations, gnome3 is just not doing the right thing.
>         And what irritates me is how the gnome3 fanboys (and more
>         importantly, developers), seem to never acknowledge that
>         different people have different tastes. The whole "we know
>         best" thing is a disease.
>         I'm really not that odd. I want a *few* things:
>
>             - smaller fonts (especially window decorations)
>             - sane "start new terminal" without multiple steps from
>             the panel
>             - auto-hide the panel so that I don't have to feel "all
>             emo all the time"
>             - focus-follows-mouse
>             - the ability to use a few default flags for certain programs 
>
>         and the fact is that none of the above are "odd" requests, but
>         for some unknown reasons gnome makes these fundamental things
>         really inconvenient and hard to find.
>         And christ people - stop telling me about gnome-tweak-tool. I
>         *know *. I mentioned the damn thing in the post, for chissake!
>         Telling me about the tweak tool just shows that you didn't
>         even bother to read what I wrote.
>         I have found how to do all of the above things - except for
>         the "flags for favorite applications" - but the fact is, the
>         gnome extensions are not reliable and the UX *sucks*.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         full article @
>         http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-finds-gnome-34-to-be-a-total-user-experience-design-failure/11127?tag=nl.e539
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> Website: http://lugm.org
> Mailing list archive: http://discuss.lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://discuss.lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_discuss.lugm.org/attachments/20120605/071f1a73/attachment.html>