[lugm.org] Oracle db on debian 6 ia64
selven
pcthegreat at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 15:38:50 UTC 2011
Its only about support because [corporates needs 'support']. :) or have to
have someone to be blamed in case trouble happens :D.
which is why it isn't wise to have a non supported OS on it when trouble
happens and you are the sysad :D. But if you can deal with that .. i guess
:p using non supported os on it would be a good thing to find bugs :p.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
<gnukid1 at yahoo.co.uk>wrote:
> Oracle is probably a C app. It should work 90% on any
> POSIX system.
>
> Also, it makes commercial sense for oracle to work on Linux. If you
> have a client on Linux, with mysql and other services. It's going to
> be more difficult to sell oracle, if it works only on Solaris.
>
> However, I doubt they test it on anything but RedHat or SuSe.
>
> --- On *Wed, 1/6/11, Keshwarsingh Nadan <kn at debian.mu>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Keshwarsingh Nadan <kn at debian.mu>
>
> Subject: Re: [lugm.org] Oracle db on debian 6 ia64
> To: "'LUGM Discuss Mailing List'" <discuss at lugm.org>
> Date: Wednesday, 1 June, 2011, 9:59
>
>
> Aha there is nothing wrong is testing! I’m at least proud for having the
> opportunity to test oracle ee on debian! The issue I had was hardware
> related (write cache on physical disks), the blade is performing really well
> , and I highly believe that redhat & suse ent should be dropped.!
>
>
>
> Your question regarding centos: I could have used centos, oracle runs great
> on centos, you need to install X in order to run the oracle installer,
> installing X on centos means a stupid service called “Bluetooth” will be
> installed along with loads of bloatwares else it will fail the
> dependencies... Removing these services afterwards would cause issues..
>
>
>
> Anyways I’m backup by 3 more blades running hp ux 11 on three different
> chassis, if ever anything goes wrong with the actual debian blade.
>
>
>
> The databases are physically located on a storage, even if the debian blade
> is down for whatsoever reason, I don’t really care.. I should back to
> business within minutes if you understand what I’m trying to mean. Mounting
> oracle dbs isn’t difficult at all.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss-bounces at lugm.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at lugm.org] *On
> Behalf Of *ashvin saminathen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:33 PM
> *To:* LUGM Discuss Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [lugm.org] Oracle db on debian 6 ia64
>
>
>
> nice that you managed to get back on track!
>
> and i must say you are a very courageous guy!!! running 250k$ worth of
> oracle ee, on 70k$ worth of integrity but using a free officially
> unsupported OS! this is a sign of utmost courage, or well in some cases
> blatant stupidity (the boundary between the two is sometimes very blurry)!
>
> anyway i hope that you don't come to face any additional issues further
> down the way, for it does sound like a shame paying 22% yearly oracle
> support... and well since its on an unsupported OS not getting any "oracle
> level" support when your system goes hayward!
>
>
>
> On 1 June 2011 08:44, Keshwarsingh Nadan <kn at debian.mu<http://mc/compose?to=kn@debian.mu>>
> wrote:
>
> Hah I managed to get back in track, I rebooted and enabled “physical drive
> write cache” though it warned me about the “disaster” that might occur if
> blade is not ups protected.
>
>
>
> It seems that the box is functioning normally…
>
>
>
> A quick answer: the motivation here is that I’m tired with hp support,
> according to hp patches are released and tested, but when you apply, it
> always breaks something & the crazy unlimited user licenses…
>
>
>
> Oracle: we are running oracle ee which indeed is damn expensive, moved from
> oracle se that was on the old rx2620.
>
>
>
> I even tried freebsd, unfortunately the fiber daughtercard was
> incompatible, else I would have carried on with it.
>
>
>
> Oracle works fine on oracle though its unsupported, anyway I don’t need any
> “oracle level” support from oracle. Suse ent & red hat is a waste of money.
>
>
>
> kn
>
>
>
> *From:* ashvin.saminathen at gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=ashvin.saminathen@gmail.com>[mailto:
> ashvin.saminathen at gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=ashvin.saminathen@gmail.com>]
> *On Behalf Of *ashvin saminathen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2011 3:25 AM
>
>
> *To:* kn at debian.mu <http://mc/compose?to=kn@debian.mu>; LUGM Discuss
> Mailing List
>
> *Subject:* Re: [lugm.org] Oracle db on debian 6 ia64
>
>
>
> just a quick question, not really relevant to your problem.but what
> motivated the shift from hp-ux to debian, particularly on integrity?
> I deployed some rx6600 a few years back, and i can't really see the logic
> in moving from HP-UX to linux on integrity... even from a financial point of
> view, since you are running on a 4 processor machine, you must be on oracle
> EE DB, pretty sure 16 processor oracle licenses and support are much more of
> a burden than the hp-ux licenses and support...
>
> coming back to your original question, i only worked with prod oracle on
> solaris or hp-ux, but i found the following article... maybe it can help you
> :
> http://www.idevelopment.info/data/Oracle/DBA_tips/Linux/LINUX_8.shtml#Configuring%20Oracle%20User%20Shell%20Limits
> also how's your swap configurations?
>
> p.s
> if you get fed up of dealing with HP and paying those crazy prices, gimme a
> call, I know of a great Japanese company who are very accommodating when it
> comes to servers :)
>
> On 31 May 2011 21:22, <kn at debian.mu <http://mc/compose?to=kn@debian.mu>>
> wrote:
>
> Yea the prompt appears immediately when oracle is not running! Increasing
> the wide limits helped a lot, to which value can I extend it? I've never
> dealt with these kind of issues before.
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ajay R Ramjatan <ajay.ramjatan at gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=ajay.ramjatan@gmail.com>
> >
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:17:10
> To: <kn at debian.mu <http://mc/compose?to=kn@debian.mu>>; LUGM Discuss
> Mailing List<discuss at lugm.org <http://mc/compose?to=discuss@lugm.org>>
> Subject: Re: [lugm.org] Oracle db on debian 6 ia64
>
> Silly question perhaps but you did narrow down the culprit being
> Oracle right? If Oracle is not running, then the prompt appears
> immediately?
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 18:03, <kn at debian.mu<http://mc/compose?to=kn@debian.mu>>
> wrote:
> > Hello Systems Admins / Engineers,
> >
> > I need some advise;
> >
> > I've migrated from an old hp integrity rx2620 server running hp ux 11b)
> to an integrity bl870c i2 blade with the following specs:
> >
> > 4x itanium 9340
> > 704gb ram (44x 16gb ram sticks)
> > 4x300 gb @ 15k rpm sas (raid 1 with 2 online spares for os only)
> > OS: debian 6.0.2
> >
> > Oracle 11g r2 is being run on the server and databases stored on an hp
> eva 4400.
> >
> > The problem started when the blade celebrated its first day in
> production! The shell prompt appears 15mins after hitting the password!
> Tried to log in via ssh, it took approx one hour for the prompt to display!
> >
> > Oracle advised to dismount all databases and increase file descriptors, I
> adjusted the oracle user a soft & hard limit of 100000 / 9999999 in
> /etc/security/limits.conf. Appended fs.file-max = 9999999 in
> /etc/sysctl.conf , did a sysctl -p & rebooted.
> >
> > Prompts now appears after approx 8 mins on console, 35 mins via ssh..
> >
> > To which extent can I increase the wide limits?
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > kn
> > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
> >__________________________________________________________
> > Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> > Website: http://lugm.org
> > Mailing list archive: http://lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> > Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> > IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> Website: http://lugm.org
> Mailing list archive: http://lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> Website: http://lugm.org
> Mailing list archive: http://lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> Website: http://lugm.org
> Mailing list archive: http://lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> Website: http://lugm.org
> Mailing list archive: http://lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
>
>
--
$3|v3n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://discuss.lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_discuss.lugm.org/attachments/20110601/a8f9fc0a/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list