[lugm.org] LUGM constitution

[selven]

On a side note, why not meet up with logan and get a photocopy done? =)



On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:23 PM, selven <pcthegreat at gmail.com> wrote:

> It is not a weird practice. A lot of organisations does this, anyway, I
> replied out of courtesy. :) If you want to make a lot of noise about this
> and complain and rant, please feel free to do so.
>
>
> Why is this considered normal practice?
>
> For a guy who thinks he does anything in security, you should know that
> you should never trust information that is received on a non official end.
>
> The only rules and regulation that is valid and official for the LUG is
> the one at the Registrar of Association. Which is why, this is the advised
> way to get this rules and regulations.
>
>
> If you want a non official source for the Rules and regulation, Look in
> the LUGM archive =) , if you didn't know, you can search a mailing list.
> Don't mistake "ensuring rules are followed" to "providing" a copy of the
> rule on each request.
>
>
> I myself trust only the registrar of association's copy for the rules. The
> registrar is the authority on this.
> =) As the guy who was the first secretary to get the rule approved, I
> cannot advise you to use unofficial rules and regulation.
>
>
> Please do not take this message on a personal note, I know that you tend
> to make a lot of scene with people not putting stuffs online or whatever,
> but, institutions needs to be respected, the Registrar of Association is
> THE place to go, I can be wrong, the Registrar's copy will NEVER be wrong,
> because that's the only valid and official copy.
>
>
>
> ps. I replied instead of the secretary, hope this will not be a big issue
> for you. Like I stated the other day, get things done quick, wasting time
> just serves no one else.
>
>
> Have a good night boy
>
> +$3|v3n
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Ish Sookun <ish at hacklog.mu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/05/2016 06:35 PM, selven wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ish, LUGM's rules and regulation can be found at the registrar of
>>> association of Mauritius, it can be consulted freely from there. As for
>>> what it is not posted on lugm's website, this is an exec decision, no
>>> one ever pushed that forward, this would be a very interesting thing to
>>> do in the future. But the normal legal way is to consult it at the
>>> Registrar of association. Floor one.
>>>
>>>
>> It is a weird practice that a LUG member should be asked to get a copy of
>> the association's rules from the Registrar of Associations.
>>
>> @Logan, are the rules identical this specimen [1] or LUGM has additional
>> rules?
>>
>> [1]
>> http://socialsecurity.govmu.org/English/Department/Senior%20Citizens/Documents/RULES%20AND%20REGULATIONS%20OF%20THE%20ASSOCIATION.pdf
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Ish Sookun
>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
>> Website: http://lugm.org
>> Mailing list archive:
>> http://discuss.lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_discuss.lugm.org/
>> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
>> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Pirabarlen Cheenaramen *| $3|v3n
> /*memory is like prison*/
> (user==selven)?free(user):user=malloc(sizeof(brain));
> P Save electricity & disk space. Cat this mail to >/dev/null 2>&1 after
> use.
>



-- 
*Pirabarlen Cheenaramen *| $3|v3n
/*memory is like prison*/
(user==selven)?free(user):user=malloc(sizeof(brain));
P Save electricity & disk space. Cat this mail to >/dev/null 2>&1 after use.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://discuss.lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_discuss.lugm.org/attachments/20160505/b49fd934/attachment.html>