[lugm.org] GPL is a thorn for business

[Ajay R Ramjatan]

What they do is provide full patched kernel sources instead of
individual diffs. Nothing illegal here.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 21:42, Loganaden Velvindron <gnukid1 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Redhat admits that it ``obfuscates'' patches to prevent
> Oracle/CentOS/Novell from offering direct support.
> http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5oOugqiyEjkJ:www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/03/04/red_hat_twarts_oracle_and_novell_with_change_to_source_code_packaging/+open+source+undercut&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fr&client=firefox-a
> Once again, this shows the problem of the GPL: forcing
> people to redistribute their changes is a bad idea.
> By contrast, this problem is absent for companies like Juniper,
> who ship BSD-based derived OS. If they want, they can choose
> which patches they'd like to merge. This gives businesses a better
> control over their derivative work, which the GPL prevents.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Linux User Group of Mauritius (LUGM) Discuss mailing list
> Website: http://lugm.org
> Mailing list archive: http://lugm.org/pipermail/discuss_lugm.org/
> Forum: http://lugm.org/forum/
> IRC: #linux.mu on Freenode
>
>